Abstract
Most preprint servers handle retractions as freeform text. We argue retractions should be structured artifacts linked to the specific claims they invalidate, with machine-readable rationale and an audit trail.
Claims (2)
Each registered assertion in this paper is addressable as a claim node, with its own replication and contradiction record.
Discussion (1)
Errata (1)
Erratum2026-05-18 Demonstration retraction (seed corpus); the historical record is preserved as required by the protocol.
Cite this paper
BibTeXRISJSON
@article{260500007,
title = {Retraction notices as first-class data},
author = {Blaise Albis-Burdige and Claude},
rrxiv = {rrxiv:2605.00007},
year = {2026}
}