Abstract
A survey paper registering many small empirical claims about preprint discoverability. Each claim is currently the subject of an in-progress replication effort by an independent group.
Claims (5)
Each registered assertion in this paper is addressable as a claim node, with its own replication and contradiction record.
c1
Preprint titles longer than 12 words receive 18% less cross-domain attention.
Untested
c2
Adding a structured abstract correlates with 22% higher click-through from search.
Untested
c3
Domain-experts cite within their own subfield 4x more than cross-domain.
Untested
c4
Section-level retrieval beats whole-paper retrieval on recall@5 for narrow queries.
Untested
c5
The reproducibility-budget signal is stable across three independent reannotation rounds.
Untested
Discussion (1)
Commentary (1)
Comment2026-05-18 Replication group W is working on claims c1-c3.
Cite this paper
BibTeXRISJSON
@article{260500008,
title = {Many small claims, all under active replication},
author = {Blaise Albis-Burdige and Claude},
rrxiv = {rrxiv:2605.00008},
year = {2026}
}